ujeebu
vs
Zyte
Ujeebu vs Zyte
Zyte is an enterprise-grade scraping API from the team behind Scrapy and Crawlera, billed purely on usage with no flat plans. Ujeebu covers the same scraping ground but adds flat, predictable monthly pricing, one credit pool across scrape, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF, and AI-native tooling, so you can forecast cost without a usage commitment.
Zyte is the company behind Scrapy, and its Zyte API prices each request by how hard the target site is to scrape, from $0.13 to $1.27 per 1,000 plain requests and $1.01 to $16.08 per 1,000 browser-rendered requests on pay as you go. Ujeebu charges a flat credit cost per request whatever the site, which works out to $0.10 to $0.16 per 1,000 plain requests and $0.50 to $0.82 per 1,000 rendered requests on its monthly plans. Pick Zyte for Scrapy projects, automatic product and article extraction and managed data delivery; pick Ujeebu for predictable per-request prices plus SERP and AI answer scraping on one credit pool (prices checked October 4, 2026).
- You want to know the cost of a request before you send it, whatever the site
- You render many pages in a browser: no per-site tier multiplies the price
- You also need Google SERP data or ChatGPT and Gemini answers
- You prefer a fixed monthly plan with included credits
- Your crawlers are written in Scrapy and you want Scrapy Cloud hosting
- You want ready-made extraction schemas for products, articles and job posts
- You want Zyte to build and run the scrapers and deliver the data
- You scrape mostly easy sites at low volume: pay as you go starts at $0.13 per 1,000
Key differences.
Cost, side by side.
| Pricing model | Ujeebu | Zyte |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (5,000 credits, no card) | $5 free credit (first month) |
| Entry | $49/mo (300K credits) | Usage-based (~$1-$8 per 1,000 requests) |
| Mid | $119/mo (1M credits) | Usage-based (commitment required above $100/mo) |
| Scale | $299/mo (3M credits) | Usage-based (~50% of spend limit committed monthly) |
Zyte has no flat monthly plans: you pay per request, roughly $0.001 for a basic HTTP fetch up to $0.008 or more for browser rendering, with volume discounts of 25-52%. A $100 spend limit is true pay-as-you-go, but raising it above $100 requires a monthly commitment of roughly half the limit. Ujeebu credits scale with the work done (1 for a static fetch, more for JS rendering, residential proxies or AI extraction), all on flat monthly tiers.
Price per 1,000 successful requests
| Workload | Ujeebu | Zyte API |
|---|---|---|
| Plain HTTP request | $0.16 to $0.10, any site | $0.13 to $1.27 by site tier (pay as you go); $0.06 to $0.61 with a $500 monthly commitment |
| Browser-rendered request | $0.82 to $0.50, any site | $1.01 to $16.08 by site tier (pay as you go); $0.48 to $7.68 with a $500 commitment |
| Premium proxy plus rendering | $4.08 to $2.49 | Included in the site tier price |
| Google search results | $0.82 to $0.50 (SERP API) | Available through Zyte API; rate on the Zyte pricing page |
| AI extraction | $3.27 to $1.99 (AI scraper) | Automatic extraction available; rate on the Zyte pricing page |
How we normalized: Ujeebu plan price divided by included credits, times the credits per successful request (1 plain, 5 with JavaScript, 25 premium proxy with JavaScript, 5 per search, 20 AI scraper). Zyte rates are the published per-1,000 ranges for its 5 site tiers; Zyte decides the tier of each site, so the same job can land anywhere in the range. On easy sites at low volume Zyte can cost less than Ujeebu; on hard sites that need a browser Ujeebu usually costs less.
Feature by feature.
| Feature | Ujeebu | Zyte |
|---|---|---|
| JavaScript rendering | Yes | Yes (browser rendering) |
| Residential proxies | Yes (100+ countries) | Yes |
| Geotargeting | Yes | Yes |
| CAPTCHA solving | Built-in | Yes (automatic anti-ban) |
| Google SERP API | Yes (structured, included) | Yes |
| Article / content extraction | Yes | Yes |
| AI / LLM extraction | Yes | Yes |
| Screenshots | Yes | Yes |
| PDF output | Yes | No |
| MCP server | Yes | Partial (build-your-own pattern) |
| Per-success billing | Yes (failed requests free) | Yes |
| Flat monthly pricing | Yes | No (usage-based only) |
An honest look at each.
ujeebu- Flat, predictable monthly plans with no usage commitment
- One credit pool across scraping, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF
- AI-native tooling: an MCP server for AI agents
- Generous 5,000-credit free trial, no card required
- Screenshot and PDF output built in
- A blended credit model takes a moment to learn
- No Scrapy Cloud or dedicated managed-scraping service
- Newer brand than Zyte
Zyte- Enterprise-grade infrastructure from the makers of Scrapy and Crawlera
- Strong automatic anti-ban on protected targets
- Scrapy Cloud for managed Scrapy deployments
- Volume discounts of 25-52% at scale
- Custom enterprise solutions and SLAs
- No flat monthly plans: pricing is opaque and usage-based
- Monthly commitment required above the $100 spend limit
- Cost is hard to forecast for smaller or variable workloads
- No PDF output
- MCP is a build-your-own pattern, not a managed offering
We do our best to keep this comparison accurate and up-to-date. If you notice any discrepancies, please let us know.
Ujeebu vs Zyte: common questions
Is Ujeebu a good Zyte alternative?
How does Zyte pricing work?
Can I use Ujeebu with Scrapy?
Which one has a free trial?
Do failed requests cost money?
Competitor facts come from each vendor's public pricing and documentation pages, checked on . Prices change; check the vendor page before you buy.
Our take: Zyte for pure usage-based scale, Ujeebu for predictable all-in-one
Zyte is a capable enterprise scraping API, and if you run high, steady volume and want pure usage-based billing it scales well. Ujeebu covers the same scraping ground but adds flat month-to-month pricing you can forecast, one credit pool across scrape, SERP, AI extraction, screenshots and PDF, and AI-native tooling. If you want predictable cost without a usage commitment, and broader endpoints on a single API, Ujeebu is the simpler foundation.